← Back to newsletter

Newsletter

When AI Saves an Hour but Costs You Half a Day

5 min read · Issue 06 · August 2026 · Leebry team

Issue 06 cover

The way we measure AI's value is getting a bit ridiculous. "Time saved in meetings" is now a real success metric, but it only counts the good half. Nobody's building a dashboard for "hours spent re-reading what the AI did" or "times I clicked accept without really looking." That's where the cost actually lives. We were promised our time back, and a lot of us quietly became the AI's babysitter instead.

You might be in fewer meetings now, but you're also watching the AI more closely than you'd admit, making sure it doesn't do something you'll have to explain later. That cost is real, and it doesn't show up on any invoice.

The companies that come out ahead won't be the ones using the most AI. They'll be the ones honest about what supervising it actually costs. To be clear, we're not skeptics. AI is a huge accelerator in how we're building Leebry. We just think the math everyone's using is missing a line item.

In this issue, our Director of B2B Development, Dan Jaenicke, breaks down the real ROI of AI and why the human cost might matter more than the tokens.

by Dan Jaenicke, Director of B2B Development @ Leebry

The thing that changed how I think about AI cost wasn't a budget line. It was watching a one-hour task turn into a half-day because I kept catching the AI being confidently wrong and sending it back.

There's a name for that: supervision debt. It's the review time nobody budgeted for, and like any debt, it doesn't disappear just because no one's looking at it.

That debt is still worth carrying. The person reviewing is doing two jobs: quality check, and the one who answers for it when something goes wrong. Cut them out to save money, and you cut out the value with them.

We saw the same pattern in our research. The wins were always specific, and there was always a person in the loop:

An IT director cut research time on technical documentation 30-40% by putting AI on first-pass review, with the team still doing the reading.

A compliance team automated onboarding and legal reviews for a 70% efficiency gain, but every flagged application still goes to a human for verification before it's approved.

A support team's smart search knocked ticket volume down 33% by getting people answers before they had to ask, not by letting AI resolve tickets unsupervised.

Same shape every time: one team, one task, a person signing off before anything sticks. Telling everyone to "use AI for everything" is the fastest way to watch ROI disappear.

How we think about it at Leebry

We pick narrow tasks where we can point to the return. L1 tickets are the obvious one: the average takes about five minutes to resolve, and we're working to get that under 30 seconds. If we can't see a clear return, we don't build it.

Most companies won't say this out loud: they don't actually know if it's working. Only 17% of the leaders we surveyed said even half their initiatives are delivering, and 73% have no real way to measure it. Hardly anyone can tell you what they're actually getting for the bill they're already paying.

17%

of leaders surveyed said even half their AI initiatives are delivering measurable results

73%

have no real way to measure whether their AI investments are working

You don't need a dashboard to start closing that gap. You need a stopwatch.

The next time your team runs a task through AI, time two things:

How long the AI took

How long someone spent checking its work before it shipped.

Add them together. That's the real number, not the one that ends up in a slide about hours saved. Do that for a week on one recurring task. If the second number is bigger than the first, you've found the line item this issue's been talking about.

That's Issue #6.

If your team's found an honest way to measure supervision debt, or if there's something else missing from the ROI math, we want to hear it. Reply and tell us.

See you in two weeks.

Leebry is a Work AI platform built by MacPaw. It connects the tools your team already uses (Confluence, Slack, Jira, Okta, HRIS and more) to give employees secure, citation-backed answers and automate everyday workflows through a single interface.

Subscribe to get upcoming episodes

A biweekly field report on enterprise AI deployment, written for IT leaders by the people doing the work.

Subscribe on LinkedIn

More editions

Newsletter

Most AI Tools Are Not Actually Smart

Issue 04 · 5 min read

Newsletter

Your AI Didn't Get the Memo

Issue 05 · 5 min read